Through observation on the subjects, process of the Lego Datac Robotics operation could be detected an analysis of the quality record.
将学生科学学习历程，以一个月的时间，每周三天，每天3小时的探究活动，透过现场的观察与记录，进行质的分析与研究。
The findings of this study were summarized as follows:（1）Lego Datac Robotics System provided a plentiful high interactive scientific learning environment for students who had the tremendous opportunities on utilization, training, and cultivation of multiple scientific processing skills.
研究结果发现：学生在进行电脑乐高教学方案和探究活动情境中，电脑乐高提供丰富且具高互动性的科学学习环境，让学生可以在活动过程中，使用、精练与培养学生各种的科学过程技能。
Based on constructionism and teaching strategy of inquiry, two groups with three boys and girls were teamed up for three days per week. In which three hours of Lego Datac Robotics club activities were implemented.
研究者以建造论与探究教学策略作为理论基础，透过社团活动的方式，以六年级学生男、女各三名，分成两组进行电脑乐高教学方案和探究活动情境。
Lego Datac Robotics System also provided an exploring activities environment for cultivating students problem solving ability. There were five processes: to ascertain the problem, to team work, to design and assembling for the brick, to program and execute, and to modify.
在电脑乐高教学方案和探究活动情境中，提供学生问题解决的训练与培养之情境，其问题解决的历程包含（1）问题的确定（2）分工（3）积木设计与组装（4）程式设计与执行（5）修正。
Based upon the pedagogy program of Lego Datac Robotics System and exploring activities for the sixth grader, the purposes of this study were as follows:(1) to investigate how students used Scientific Process Skills, (2) to investigate the process of Problem Solving, (3) to investigate how students reached the objectives of cooperative learning by communication, discussion, and helping each other, (4) to investigate the impacts of teaching activity and exploring the impact on learning science attitude of elementary students.
本研究目的在探讨国小六年级学生在「电脑乐高」教学方案和探究活动情境下，学生如何运用科学过程技能？学生之问题解决历程是如何？学生在探究活动环境中如何与同侪沟通互动，进而达到「合作学习」之情形？对学生科学学习态度之影响如何？
Results: Datac heck, selection of grouping variables, main diagnosis and operation group, deletion of statistical insignificant items would influence the grouping results and cost level, but the influencing degree and scope of each variable is different.
结果：数据的核对、分类变量的选择、主要诊断和手术操作的分类及剔除统计无关项等都影响分组结果和费用水平，但各因素的影响程度大小和范围不一样。